When I see real Americans like Charles Payne I recognize the real obstacles he surmounted to get where he is today, and then compare to what people think about Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Sotoero, I get really angry.
People like to fawn over Obama’s rise to the presidency because they love to fantasize that like Charles Payne, Obama was an example of an underprivileged black who brought himself up out of the ghetto with hard work and accomplishment.
The truth is, Obama is the product of a Bush cousin (his mother), with ties to the Illuminati families, and was picked out by the evil Henry Kissinger as far back as college (just as David Rockefeller picked William Clinton and Zbigniew Brzezinksi picked Jimmy Carter out of total obscurity) and was thus destined to be Kissinger’s Manchurian Candidate.
The reason Obama seems to have “no birth certificate, no college records, no roommates, no student loans, no girlfriends/boyfriends, and no past”, and was able to gain the presidency with virtually no prior major accomplishment or business experience is that he was likely a CIA asset as proven by the 26 or so SS numbers he used over the years.
Charles Payne is a real American success story. Obama on the other hand, was born of privilege, then groomed and appointed by the elitists and is to this day being covered for by our own CIA.
Additional info:
Matt Patterson (columnist – Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner) thinks Obama is a loser as well…
He wrote in part:
“How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job? Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer”; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”) ; and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?”