United Nations is America’s Biggest Threat to Liberty

The UN is an ugly totalitarian threat that must be countered with local control

In case you wondered why things don’t seem to be going well for us in the US these days, look no further than the United Nations. That’s right, the organization that was founded back in 1945 as the “League of Nations”, ostensibly to create a means of gathering for all countries to talk and keep the peace, has turned into an ugly totalitarian threat to every country on earth.

Repeating for emphasis: the UN has become the biggest threat to our liberty today — more so than any physical attack from any outside source.

Some very important articles are being written to give you an idea of the what the bureaucrats at the UN are doing to effectively control every country by eradicating the sovereignty of each nation. As the song says, “Everybody Wants to Rule the World”, and the communists at the UN are no different.

Despite the UN’s claims that any number of a multitude of its programs and resolutions are non-binding and merely guidelines, here we present a documented attempt to install its demands as international law, law which would supersede our United States Constitution and State Constitutions.

While claiming they do not want to destroy the sovereignty of individual nations, their attempts to create a constitution for the world seems to indicate otherwise. Consider this information on DICED :

The writers describe the Covenant as a “living document,” a blueprint that will be adopted by all members of the United Nations. They say that global partnership is necessary in order to achieve Sustainable Development, by focusing on “social and economic pillars.” The writers are very careful to avoid the phrase, “one world government.” Proper governance is necessary on all levels, “from the local to the global.” (p.36)

The Covenant underwent four writings, in 1995, 2000, 2004, and 2010, influenced by the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development, by ideas of development control and social engineering by the United Nations, “leveling the playing field for international trade, and having a common basis of future lawmaking.”

Article 3 proposes that the entire globe should be under “the protection of international law.”
Article 11 discusses “equity” and “equitable manner” which are code words for communism.
Article 16 requires that all member nations must adopt environmental conservation into all national decisions.
Article 20 requires that all nations must “mitigate the adverse effects of climate change.” If we ratify this document, we must thus fight a non-existent man-made climate change.
Article 31 requires the eradication of poverty by spreading the wealth from developed nations to developing countries.
Article 32 requires recycling.
Article 33 demands that countries calculate “the size of the human population their environment is capable of supporting and to implement measures that prevent the population from exceeding that level.”
Article 33 delineates long-term resettlement and estimating the “carrying capacity of the environment.”
Article 34 demands the maintenance of an open and non-discriminatory international trading system in which “prices of commodities and raw materials reflect the full direct and indirect social and environmental costs of their extraction, production, transport, marketing, and where appropriate, ultimate disposal.” The capitalist model of supply and demand pricing does not matter.
Article 36 describes military and hostile activities.
Article 39 decides management plans and quotas for permissible taking or “harvesting transboundary biological resources.”
Article 41 requires integrated planning systems, irrespective of administrative boundaries within a country, and is based on Paragraph 10.5 of Agenda 21, which seeks to “facilitate allocation of land to the uses that provide the greatest sustainable benefits and to promote the transition to a sustainable and integrated management of land resources.” The impact assessment procedure is developed by the World Bank.
“Aquifers, drainage basins, coastal, marine areas, and any areas called ecological units must be taken into account when allocating land for municipal, agricultural, grazing, forestry, and other uses.” Agricultural subsidies are discouraged, as well as subsidizing private enterprises.
“Physical planning must follow an integrated approach to land use – infrastructure, highways, railways, waterways, dams, and harbors. Town and country planning must include land use plans elaborated at all levels of government.”
Article 48 demands that biotechnology from research and development and royalties be shared; free access and transfer of technology is also required.
Article 51 reveals that we will have to pay for these repressive new requirements while Article 52 shows that we must pay 0.7 percent of GDP for Official Development Assistance. This reaffirms the political commitment made in Paragraph 33.13 of Agenda 21 in 1992.
Article 69 deals with settlement of disputes by an arbitrary tribunal such as the Permanent Court of Arbitration, the International Court of Justice, or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.
Article 71 describes the amendment process, which is submitted to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. UN Secretary-General would review the implementation of this document every five years.

The writer of the article then concludes that “Since this Draft Covenant has a Preamble and 79 articles, it is obviously intended to be a world constitution for global governance, an onerous way to control population growth, re-distribute wealth, force social and “economic equity and justice,” economic control, consumption control, land and water use control, and re-settlement control as a form of social engineering.”

Read more about “DICED is UN’s Environmental Constitution for the World”
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45370

So who will enforce this new ‘law’? According to this article U.N. Charter or U.S. Constitution? “Three of our Supreme Court Justices have now said that they will take into consideration the laws of other countries when making decisions on this countries laws. These Justices are all members of the CFR.”

It isn’t like we haven’t noticed that President Obama called in the UN to help oversee our elections, or didn’t notice the fact that he wanted them to intervene on behalf of his lawsuit against the border states and their voting ID laws.. President Obama follows the UN’s lead on children among other things.

Still not convinced the UN is dangerous? In the name of protecting human rights, they have set themselves up as the overseer of all things governmental and are acting as though control of everything from the sky to the water to your very happiness belongs to them.

For example, the UN now Seeks to Control the Internet… which would be a disaster for grassroots patriot groups. Surfing anonymously or putting up private websites with your opinions on them, may not be allowed.

The US has already passed legislation that would put our country in compliance with the UN’s “Codex Alimentarius” which would put all our food supply under the control of the world banks.

But there are yet more severe consequences one of which is the revival of the eugenics movement, disguised once again under the banner of population control and ‘sustainability’.

The Revitalized Eugenics Movement & the FDA’s Role.

Oh and I’m not done yet. The UN has a blatant program of indoctrination called International Baccalaureate which some schools have bought, literally, for their who districts. But under the IDEA Act, the UN influence is rife within our schools, with political indoctrination, not academics, as the first order of concern.

One UN official is calling for the UN to lead a global revolution led by central governments. “The United Nations is a global institution that is seeking control over the world’s natural resources, Internet communications, and conventional arms trade. No centralized institution should be entrusted with such power, let alone one comprised of a majority of corrupt, dictatorial states and left-wing activists calling for some kind of global revolution.”

So have you had enough yet, and what are you going to do about it? If you live in a town in NH, you should mark your calendar for the dates of your town meetings and deliberative sessions… planning and zoning board meetings, and other meetings where regional planners will be hawking their ideas to your local officials. This is where a lot of the above-mentioned ideas of the UN may appear under the guise of local control.

Please get to know the Granite State Future program and how it is in alignment with UN goals and objectives for land use and management of PEOPLE by virtue of REGIONALISM.

Here are the Agenda 21 guidelines for encouragement of REGIONAL MANAGEMENT and implementation thereof:
http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm

Compare to the goals of the GSF program in NH: http://granitestatefuture.org/our-plans/

What’s next? Telling you how many children you can have or who must fill up the unused bedrooms in your home? Let them deny it has anything to do with the UN at all, or that they have authority to implement this but they WILL tell you they are going ahead with these plans whether you LIKE IT OR NOT.