UN Wants More Global Governance
How transnationalism trickles down to your community
In this Tweet from the UN’s official “ECOSOC” account, a statement was made that contradicts the UN’s claims of not wanting to be a “world government”; the Tweet asked for more global governance and authority to back up schemes of redistribution of the wealth worldwide.
@unecosoc urges stronger global governance to achieve anti-poverty goals ow.ly/l6LiY#MDGs #post2015 #SustainableDevelopment
— UN ECOSOC President (@UNECOSOC) May 17, 2013
Clicking on the link in the Tweet will bring you to the full article.
One of the ways to achieve the goal of wealth redistribution is for government to take control over more of the resources. This would be done in accordance with the ideas outlined in “Agenda 21“, the UN’s plan for the world, elements of which are now fully embedded into the policies of our own US State Department and agencies such as the EPA, HUD, and DOT. (Read here just one of many documents that affirm the US ‘commitment’ to enforcing Agenda 21 as well as other places on our State Dept website.)
In order to promote Agenda 21 goals locally, which the UN recommends, the ICLEI was created to guide towns and cities into these decisions. Taxpayer monies are used to allow towns and cities to pay “dues” to what is basically a lobbying firm for UN goals, the results of which would possibly add more taxation and restrictions upon our citizenry. And in NH, where HUD provides the money, the Regional Planning Commissions are following through, aided an abetted by a myriad of non-government groups and private corporations and foundations, giving the public the impression that programs such as Granite State Future have public support.
Unelected boards and commissions, such as the “Water Sustainability Commission” created in 2011 by a governor’s executive order, puts out “reports” that mirror word for word these Agenda 21 goals. Legislation is then promoted by unsuspecting NH Senators and Representatives that would give these unelected boards and commissions enabling authority to tax and control.
One such bill is SB 11 which will have a vote on May 22, 2013 in the NH House of Representatives. This bill would created an appointed board called a “regional water district” that would have the power to tax based on these water commission reports. In Maryland, the EPA has demanded a reduction in the nitrogen of the Chesapeake Bay. Likewise, the Great Bay of NH has been targeted for the same reason, and thus the fear that a newly formed “water district” could impose the same tax on roofs, driveways, and walkways on homeowners as was done in Maryland, was born.
Regionalism is an end run around local government. Look carefully at what their goals, and how they plan to accomplish them. And for those who still do not understand how “transnationalism” has trickled down, remember the slogan “think globally, act locally”. They have acted locally, and therefore, so should you.
Unelected regional boards, paid millions of your tax dollars, are paying “dues” to UN lobbying groups such as ICLEI. (Usually lobbyists have to pay the politicians to do their bidding, not the other way around!) These “advisory” groups come with a global agenda that doesn’t originate in the community. More (federal) tax dollars from HUD enable their actions. The goals of these regional boards and commissions are shored up by more lobbying groups from wealthy corporate interests, whose influence is greater than yours due to your inability to vote out the perpetrators, or vote against their proposed taxation schemes, even those that surface as legislation such as SB 11. More tax dollars are spent on PR firms who guarantee they will successfully give the appearance of acceptance of these ideas by the public.
Are you angry yet?